Television crime dramas thrive on tension, suspense, and the unwavering commitment of professionals who solve complex cases under relentless pressure. Shows like Criminal Minds, NCIS, Law & Order, CSI, and countless others have built empires on the procedural formula—crime is committed, team investigates, justice is served. But within this formula exists a particular trope that, while once engaging, has been milked to the point of narrative bankruptcy: the kidnapping of a team member. What was once a harrowing twist has become a tired device used to artificially inflate stakes and wring emotional drama from well-worn characters, regardless of whether the narrative justifies it. It’s become a creative crutch, a signpost not of daring storytelling, but of stagnation.
The premise is usually the same. An episode (or arc) opens with a team member—usually a fan favorite or someone previously given little to do—being taken hostage. The remainder of the episode cuts between their team frantically trying to locate them and the victim enduring psychological or physical torture. Flashbacks, moral dilemmas, a ticking clock, and an obligatory “what if we don’t find them in time?” speech ensue. Inevitably, they’re rescued, sometimes with a scar or lesson, but rarely with consequences that endure beyond a commercial break. The characters reset, the episode ends, and we await the next iteration. It’s a narrative circle that masquerades as drama but barely musters anything more than déjà vu.
Why is this trope so prevalent, and more importantly, why is it so lazy?
The Illusion of High Stakes
The core goal of television is engagement, and few scenarios immediately provoke empathy and tension like a kidnapping. It’s personal. It disrupts the team dynamic. It promises an emotional payoff. In theory, a well-written abduction story allows a deep dive into the kidnapped character’s psyche. It can unearth backstory, vulnerabilities, regrets. But the problem is execution. These episodes rarely dig deep. They promise trauma and deliver surface-level thrills. Viewers know the rules—no main character ever dies mid-season unless it’s a contract issue. So the supposed “high stakes” are neutered by formulaic predictability.
These episodes are written to look like they raise the stakes, but they don’t. The illusion of danger is presented without consequence. It’s like a magician who repeats the same trick with different lighting and expects the audience to remain awed. It’s writing that banks on adrenaline over authenticity, and familiarity over innovation.
Emotional Exploitation in Place of Development
In a well-written drama, characters evolve naturally, with growth tied to meaningful events. In these kidnapping scenarios, writers often fast-track character “development” by forcing them through trauma, then stapling a few sobering monologues onto the end. “I realized how much I took my life for granted,” the rescued agent might say, before the credits roll and the revelation is promptly forgotten by next week. It’s not real growth—it’s emotional manipulation in the guise of writing. By placing a character in peril, writers attempt to wring gravity from a lightweight script. It’s exploitative, not expressive.
Moreover, it often amounts to cheap emotional labor from both actors and audience. We’re asked to feel something deep for an experience that will have little to no lasting narrative consequence. The script demands panic, heartbreak, and eventual catharsis—but rarely earns it. It’s a short circuit of what should be a long emotional process.
It Disrupts Team Dynamics for the Wrong Reasons
Crime dramas, at their best, are ensemble shows. The chemistry of a team—be it dysfunctional or harmonious—is what keeps viewers invested beyond episodic cases. But in these kidnapping scenarios, the team dynamics get distorted, not enhanced. Writers tend to split the team into frantic action mode (breaking rules to save their colleague) and emotional breakdown mode (cue tearful monologues about “how much they mean to me”). These are not organic evolutions of the characters’ relationships—they’re forced, situational, and disappear once the threat is resolved.
Compare this to truly character-driven shows like The Wire, where tension and stakes come from the system, not from artificially induced peril. Characters are made vulnerable by their flaws, choices, and environments—not just by being tossed into a van by a villain-of-the-week. The team-kidnap trope strips away nuance in favor of melodrama, reducing complex dynamics to emotional clichés.
Narrative Recycling and Franchise Fatigue
When every crime drama in existence seems to rely on this trope, the fatigue becomes collective. The list of shows guilty of this repetitive device is long and prestigious. Below is a breakdown of major offenders:
The Most Egregious Offenders: A Breakdown
Criminal Minds
This show is perhaps the gold standard for overusing the trope. Nearly every major character has been kidnapped, tortured, or held hostage at some point:
-
Spencer Reid is kidnapped, tortured, and even forced into a drug addiction arc (“Revelations”).
-
Emily Prentiss fakes her death after being captured by an international criminal.
-
JJ, Morgan, and Garcia each have their own “abduction episodes,” complete with team scrambling and last-minute rescues.
At a certain point, one starts to wonder if the Behavioral Analysis Unit is cursed, given how often its agents are victims rather than protectors. The repetitive use diminishes impact. What should be a game-changing moment becomes formula.
NCIS
Another serial offender:
-
Tony DiNozzo and Ziva David are each kidnapped multiple times, often in romantic-adjacent storylines.
-
McGee is taken hostage in various episodes, usually to highlight his “unlikely hero” growth.
-
Gibbs, the seemingly indestructible team leader, even has his own kidnapping and revenge arc.
These stories rarely result in long-term character change. The events come and go like seasonal storms. By the fifth or sixth iteration, it’s just background noise.
Bones
-
Temperance Brennan and Seeley Booth are each kidnapped on separate occasions.
-
Supporting characters like Zack Addy and Angela Montenegro are also endangered in elaborate villain plots.
Each of these instances plays out with the expected tropes: isolation, psychological torture, a last-minute rescue, and an episode-ending hug. The fact that these brilliant scientists keep getting abducted by serial killers with themed murder rooms starts to feel more like parody than drama.
Law & Order: SVU
Though often more grounded than other procedurals, SVU indulges in the trope, particularly with Olivia Benson, who is kidnapped multiple times and held hostage in psychologically brutal storylines. While Mariska Hargitay delivers powerful performances, the repeated use of her character as victim often feels more like trauma tourism than character exploration.
CSI
All flavors (Las Vegas, Miami, New York) rely on this trope:
-
Grissom’s team deals with one of the more famous abduction episodes: “Grave Danger,” where Nick Stokes is buried alive (directed by Quentin Tarantino, no less).
-
Horatio in CSI: Miami constantly finds himself in gunpoint standoffs and kidnapping-adjacent scenarios.
-
Mac Taylor in CSI: NY gets his turn being hunted.
While visually memorable, these episodes often reduce characters to plot devices in need of rescue, rather than active agents in their own narrative.
Hawaii Five-0, FBI, The Mentalist, Quantico, Lie to Me, Castle, Blacklist…
The trope has spread like a virus across the genre. Characters are kidnapped, brutalized, and returned so frequently it starts to feel like an occupational hazard, not a rare emergency.
A Symptom of Creative Desperation
Behind the scenes, the kidnapping trope often signals deeper problems in the writers’ room. Perhaps the series has run too long and writers are scraping the bottom of the idea barrel. Perhaps network mandates demand higher ratings, and nothing spikes viewership like an “event episode.” Perhaps writers feel pressure to “do something big” with underused characters, and kidnapping them seems like a shortcut to relevance.
Regardless of the reason, it shows a lack of confidence in quieter, smarter storytelling. Writers are capable of nuanced plots and rich character arcs, but the trope circumvents all of that in favor of instant drama. It’s fast food writing—easy to consume, forgettable, and ultimately unhealthy for the narrative metabolism of a series.
Compare this to a truly effective emotional arc: Tony Soprano’s sessions with Dr. Melfi, or Walter White’s slow moral decay. These stories are slow burns, built on psychological complexity, not plot contrivance. They don’t rely on bodily peril to provoke reaction—they earn their emotional weight through character choices and consequences. The kidnapping trope in crime shows, by contrast, is like yanking a fire alarm to wake up a sleeping class. It gets attention, but doesn’t teach anything new.
Gendered Patterns and Lazy Feminism
Another wrinkle in this trope is how often it’s deployed along gendered lines. Women, especially, are disproportionately victimized in these plots. Whether it’s JJ in Criminal Minds, Kate in NCIS, or Angela in Bones, female characters are often abducted to showcase the male team members’ emotional responses, or worse, to provide romantic tension. It’s damsel-in-distress theater disguised as empowerment.
When male characters are kidnapped, it’s often to reveal a hidden vulnerability or tragic past. But because the setup is so common, these revelations feel less like depth and more like checkbox development. “Give him a torture flashback, a rescue, and a new scar—character evolved!” It’s lazy, cynical writing.
Better Ways to Raise Stakes
Writers have countless tools to elevate tension. A moral conflict, an internal betrayal, a deeply personal case, a broken chain of justice—these can all raise stakes without resorting to physical peril. A character choosing to break the law for the greater good, or grappling with a life-altering diagnosis—these are rich, character-based storylines that carry real emotional and psychological weight.
And raising stakes doesn’t always mean escalation. Sometimes it means slowing down and turning inward. Let the characters make hard choices. Let their past haunt them. Let their relationships evolve organically. Trust the audience to care without dragging someone into a basement dungeon yet again.
Subversion and Evolution: The Way Forward
Some shows do manage to subvert the trope. Breaking Bad’s treatment of Jesse’s captivity is harrowing, drawn-out, and transformative. It isn’t used for a single-episode spike—it’s a story-changing event. The Americans avoids literal kidnapping and instead traps its characters in psychological prisons. Mindhunter uses quiet conversations to build deeper tension than any kidnapping scene could offer.
When done with care and intention, a team-member-in-peril plot can have impact. But it must have consequences. It must ripple forward. It must affect who the characters are, how they relate, what they choose. Otherwise, it’s a fireworks show that leaves no trace—loud, bright, and instantly forgotten.
Television has never been more ambitious, more complex, or more willing to take risks—except, it seems, when it comes to crime procedurals. These shows cling to formulas because they know they work, but in doing so, they miss opportunities to truly innovate. The kidnapped-team-member trope is not just overused—it’s emblematic of a deeper unwillingness to trust the audience, to challenge characters, or to let stories breathe.
Crime drama fans deserve better. Writers are capable of better. It’s time to stop recycling the same tired peril and instead ask what really makes a character compelling, what really raises stakes, and what really keeps us watching. The genre doesn’t need another abduction. It needs an evolution.
This post has already been read 44 times!
